tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8283950071005526162.post4075879574046526663..comments2023-12-09T13:25:54.553+01:00Comments on Para's Puzzle Site: Puzzle #14: CorralParahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02367804879917808922noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8283950071005526162.post-65314248259817268402011-10-29T03:21:32.091+02:002011-10-29T03:21:32.091+02:00This is a great puzzle. I do these as I fly acros...This is a great puzzle. I do these as I fly across the country (airline pilot). Keeps the mind alert.<br /><br />Thanks. And keep them coming.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8283950071005526162.post-58765122317720270152011-09-24T23:42:28.409+02:002011-09-24T23:42:28.409+02:00I have never been a fan of the "including the...I have never been a fan of the "including the cell itself" rule myself either. But that's probably because I was more used to four winds and seethrough puzzles when I started. It just felt more natural to think an 8 sees 4 horizontal, so it sees 4 vertical istead of seeing 5 vertical. That was also a reason I regularly messed up in these puzzles.<br /><br />But I decided to just stick to the convention for this puzzle type here.Parahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02367804879917808922noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8283950071005526162.post-16929476945924434152011-09-24T11:49:36.170+02:002011-09-24T11:49:36.170+02:00I don't like the form of this puzzle. If all n...I don't like the form of this puzzle. If all number is painted than it isnt extra information that this square is counted.<br />For instance in Seethrough puzzle (see Puzzle Picnic) the number isnt counted.<br /><br />Unfortunately this is the usual form of this type.Valeziushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04525825808476208283noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8283950071005526162.post-79191943304627059122011-09-24T10:20:27.417+02:002011-09-24T10:20:27.417+02:00Success, yay! Not quite sure where I went off trac...Success, yay! Not quite sure where I went off track.<br /><br />Cheers<br />RobAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8283950071005526162.post-13482775138286665062011-09-24T09:08:44.070+02:002011-09-24T09:08:44.070+02:00Great, thanks! I'll give it another try soon.
...Great, thanks! I'll give it another try soon.<br /><br />Cheers<br />RobAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8283950071005526162.post-36674292208639890332011-09-24T06:27:29.527+02:002011-09-24T06:27:29.527+02:00Agree with Bram - this is logically solvableAgree with Bram - this is logically solvableDebhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11099751059392331218noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8283950071005526162.post-84954728854127710302011-09-23T22:58:36.780+02:002011-09-23T22:58:36.780+02:00Hi
I've doublechecked the solution with the p...Hi<br /><br />I've doublechecked the solution with the puzzle and it seems to be correct. You can email me at bram.d.laat [at] gmail [dot] com (note the missing e) and show me where and how it goes wrong. I hopefully be able to help you out.<br /><br />BramParahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02367804879917808922noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8283950071005526162.post-38670316597075918942011-09-23T22:31:50.065+02:002011-09-23T22:31:50.065+02:00I've solved twice with the same contradiction…...I've solved twice with the same contradiction… Probably I'm making some bad deduction, but considering nobody has commented with success yet, perhaps there's a small chance there's an error?<br /><br />I've been having a lot of fun with your puzzles, by the way. Thanks!<br /><br />Cheers<br />RobAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com